Home › to Sceptics

4 change deniers...

Fri, 2009-05-29 13:05 — Cyber Activist

I was recently made aware of an extensive list of Scientists who refute Global Warming/Climate Change as a man made phenomena. These scientists do not dispute that Climate Change is happening, they argue that it is a natural cycle. They go on to ask governments to steer taxes into disaster preparation and continued growth to tackle the problem. The link is here:
http://www.rense.com/general79/d3m.htm

I have replied to them below:

I am not a scientist and my first glimmer of climate change came in 1998 when there was a really big heat wave. The shallow waters of Picnic Bay on Magnetic Island was too hot to walk into without burning your feet. I lived in the tropics of Qld, Australia, on an island surrounded by incredibly beautiful and diverse inshore coral reefs. Over the next two years many of these inshore reefs began to bleach and crumble. Then algae took hold. What was left (particularly in the shallower waters) was quickly suffocated by a forest of seaweed and turned into a muddy slush when the seaweed that fed off it ran out of fuel and was washed away by a minor cyclone. Said seaweed was then washed ashore and protected the trees roots (before it was cleaned up) which were badly exposed by the disappearing sand lines.

These sand lines continue to disappear on every beach I have visited in Qld over the last ten years or so. I don’t know where the sand is going, but it is rather amusing to watch the bulldozers attempt to put it all back year after year while the tides continue to grow higher and ever higher…

I watch this happening with my own eyes and try and understand why it is happening. It is very sad to witness first hand. It is not confined to any one particular beach but all of the beaches I have visited (even the ones with no continual human occupation).

I began to learn back in 1998 about global warming and climate change. Now, I do not dispute it. I just hope that there is time left for humanity to make the changes needed in order to survive as a species. Many have already lost their lives. I feel great sadness for their loss. Many more will perish in the not too distant future, particularly if we continue to deny what is happening before our very eyes.
see: http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,25555143-1702,00.html

I want a future for my children. I would like to ask those who remain in denial, what harm is there to TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION NOW? Disaster mitigation strategies must be put into place to protect those most vulnerable.

Natural or man made...does it matter?

What harm (apart from loss of income to multi-national corporations) will become this planet we all share, if we move AWAY from polluting industries and INTO a clean energy future? Whether the climate change/global warming scientists "preachers" are all full of hot air, or the others are “big industry” paid liars, there will be A LOT LESS HARM DONE to humanity and the home we all share if we clean up our act now.

Might I add that it is also ignorant and foolish to ignore the impact of multi-national corporations on our planet. Their retrenched employees (often paid off with the minimum possible) which has been ... to date... to ensure their shareholders get a nice, fat, continual return on investment and control of market share, is ensured by the fattest and most heartless.

Take a look now at what is happening to those very same shareholders... their retirement funds not up in smoke but lining the pockets of a small handful of CEO's and crooked politicians.

Time is here and now to get out of bed with multi-nationals, crooked politicians and their reckless behaviours of despoiling our planet for a quick buck ... it just makes the thin starve and fat obese... whilst continuously ignoring the fate of our children's futures.

No matter who or what you believe, cleaning up our act and getting out of bed with multinational despoilers can do us no harm.

Comments

Wed, 2011-11-09 05:51 — ian dykes (not verified)

TRUE GREEN SUBSTANTIVE SUSTAINABILITY RESOLUTION

I am a 53 year old electrical electronics engineer residing in Stratford, Ontario, Canada

I am contacting you because i possess a substantive climate change mitigation resolution that as systematically adopted by new mothers and Infants begins to forge the path to sustainability I outline.

Sustainable prosperity is specifically contingent upon a path to sustainability:

· Abate the majority of ALL short lifecycle utility of forestry. Paper product especially paper based disposables are short lifecycle utility of forestry THAT MUST BE ABATED TO CONSERVE FORESTRY, ENERGY AND FRESH WATER!

· Plant the trees otherwise consumed by short lifecycle utility and ALSO plant trees to offset escalating losses

· GLOBALLY facilitate AND FULLY exploit our biological waste as a vast renewable energy! Our biological waste is the most vast and cost effective renewable energy on this planet!

THE DAILY BAILEY INITIATES THIS PATH TO SUSTAINABILITY

This product resolution is most economically sound and capital efficient. In reality it is the only resolution that can timely abate escalation of both self evident emergent ever escalating economic and environmental crises.

I am seeking people who can agree and cooperate with me to deliver this resolution. I posses given 5 year qualified R&D scientific research tax credits. if I recover the SRTC I can fully fund commercialization and execute my proven business paradigm

Ergo I am proposing to provide all the requisite funding necessary to commercialize and execute a proven business paradigm that delivers a proven product to a proven market with 80% TMC likelihood of purchasing. This product is a health, life sciences resolution that is locally, nationally and globally applicable. When all aspects in accordance with my path to sustainability substantive mitigation that saves and preserves life on this planet results. I simply require a little cash flow to execute SRTC recovery.

In addition to 6 years full time work already spent, an all encompassing patent has been filed. However, the patent is not economically practical and was only filed to limit infringement under the NON-OBVIOUS rule. After patent filing a thorough investigation established the most suitable product that meets all mandated environmental mitigation performance criteria. The most cost effective best overall product resolution that delivers the MOST substantive and timely climate change mitigation has been identified and NO other product other than the Daily Bailey can possibly deliver it.

To this end I am willing to offer people ownership to this product in return for the capacity and willingness to cooperate with me. In return for nothing more than a capacity and willingness to work with me, I offer ownership (see patent filing certificate attached) whereby depth of willingness establishes magnitude of ownership.

The product, The Daily Bailey is a health, life sciences resolution
The product completely resolves a current disdain that limits widespread utility to a current 12% North American market share

All performance criteria and critical product acceptance factors are identified and addressed
the product is economically sound from any perspective.

A business paradigm has been developed and proven such that 99% of capital required establishing this market is eliminated!

Target market customers (TMC) are precisely identified

An upper price point is established

Vast consumer value exists

Incumbent competitors are identified and their ability to respond has been addressed
TMC’S are proven waiting and wanting to purchase the product

THE MARKET FOR THIS PRODUCT IS LOCAL, NATIONAL AND GLOBAL

The North American existing market is 7 billion per annum

12% of the market (1 billion per annum) will purchase because this resolution is far superior to current practice
the remaining 88%, primarily because it reduces their everyday expenses by 60-90% find this resolution far more appealing such that an 80% likelihood of purchasing exists.

Thus at a bare minimum, 12% of the market is wholly readily receptive and this market is 1 billion revenues per annum.

It is exceptionally realistic that 1% market share, 70 million annual revenues with 20% minimum NPBT and with P/E of 5 is easily established within 5 years without any investment.

Ergo, given you are local to me, and in the business of product innovation re: climate change mitigation can and do you want to assist me?

I realize that no man is an island.

If my proposal is of suitable interest to you then I would like to engage in further discussions.

if you want detailed information concerning me, the product THE DAILY BAILEY with copy of filed patent certificate then please provide and email address to send the information!

Please respond to

Dail...@live.com

Sincerely

I Dykes B.E.E.ENG

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.