John Howard

immoral and mendacious?

Regarding Editorial OPINION, The Weekend Australian October 27-28 2007, "Day dreaming left is in for a big surprise":

Part of the above Editorial Opinion caught my eye, and ire... "Having spent the last decade miscasting John Howard as immoral and mendacious, the intellectual left is now compounding its mistake...". I didn't know what mendacious meant but certainly understood what immoral meant, at least to me. Now that I know mendacious means lying that gives more reason to comment.

The Editorial opinion claiming John Howard as a moral leader who doesn't lie to the electorate illustrates clearly to me how morally low Australia has descended and how urgent it is to get back to something like normality. To take JUST ONE ASPECT of Howard's immorality there is something rotten in the state when a man who abuses children and their familiies and then boasts about the effectiveness of the abuse policy is considered moral and fit to govern.

I sometimes cannot sleep and literally walk the floor trying to make some sense of the gap which my mind cannot bridge between John Howard the back slapping, hugging election campaigner and John Howard the child abuser, apparently devoid of conscience. It is equally sinister to consider that at least half of the Australian population don't even care that he abuses children and still see him as one fit to govern. Why don't they ever think about what else such a man is capable of in the wrong circumstances? If he is capable of deliberate cruelty to the innocent children of Iraqi, Iranian, Afghanians etc because it is politically expedient, what on earth will stop him from abuse of the children of any other minority such as Aboriginal, Sudanese or left thinkers when public opinion can be moulded to make that a voting advantage?

The disturbing answer is that the media will not stop him, his fellow cabinet ministers, by their past record, will not stop him, the courts seem unwilling or unable to stop him, the police act as if nothing is wrong and half of Australia has been seduced by bribes and Howard's honeyed tongue while the relentless attack on human rights and freedom continues.

I hope for the day to come soon when it will be accepted as normal for leaders to be moral, for newspaper editors to seek beyond the popular and for people to become discerning and look beyond their immediate needs.

Allan Nield, Whyalla Norrie, SA 5608.

Yellow-cake John: Australia quietly signs up to nuclear club

Yellow-cake John: Australia quietly signs up to nuclear club - [Greens-Media] Mon, 17 Sep 2007 Yellow-cake John: Australia quietly signs up to nuclear club Canberra, Monday 17 September 2007 Australian Greens Climate Change

Is Howard being fair dinkum????

Everything you need to know about the corruption of climate change policy in Australia:

Is Howard being fair dinkum?
Jill Singer
June 04, 2007

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21841497-5000117,00.html

JILL Singer writes: How seriously does John Howard take climate change? Consider who he chooses to listen to on this issue so vital to our future.
Until last year, the man John Howard appointed to advise him on science policy was Dr Robert Batterham.
How confident can Australians be that he provided independent advice?

At the same time that Dr Batterham was working as the PM's chief scientist, he was earning an estimated $700,000 a year as a director of Rio Tinto, a company with a huge vested interest in Australia's carbon policy.

Taxpayers also fund the Commonwealth Government's Australian Greenhouse Office.
Gwen Andrews was its chief executive for four years, including the period John Howard was meant to be deliberating whether to ratify Kyoto. According to Andrews, he did not ask her for a single briefing.

Dr Graeme Pearman was for many years the head of the CSIRO's Division of Atmospheric Research and reveals that CSIRO scientists were gagged under pressure from the Government.
They were not allowed to talk about the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Syndicate content