Everything you need to know about the corruption of climate change policy in Australia:
Is Howard being fair dinkum?
Jill Singer
June 04, 2007
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21841497-5000117,00.html
JILL Singer writes: How seriously does John Howard take climate change? Consider who he chooses to listen to on this issue so vital to our future.
Until last year, the man John Howard appointed to advise him on science policy was Dr Robert Batterham.
How confident can Australians be that he provided independent advice?
At the same time that Dr Batterham was working as the PM's chief scientist, he was earning an estimated $700,000 a year as a director of Rio Tinto, a company with a huge vested interest in Australia's carbon policy.
Taxpayers also fund the Commonwealth Government's Australian Greenhouse Office.
Gwen Andrews was its chief executive for four years, including the period John Howard was meant to be deliberating whether to ratify Kyoto. According to Andrews, he did not ask her for a single briefing.
Dr Graeme Pearman was for many years the head of the CSIRO's Division of Atmospheric Research and reveals that CSIRO scientists were gagged under pressure from the Government.
They were not allowed to talk about the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Recent comments
1 week 8 hours ago
3 weeks 5 days ago
11 weeks 3 days ago
13 weeks 4 days ago
13 weeks 5 days ago
15 weeks 5 days ago
16 weeks 3 days ago
16 weeks 3 days ago
17 weeks 22 hours ago
29 weeks 1 day ago