Global Climate Change Action

Uncle Dootch, Chairperson of the Illawarra Local Aboriginal Land Council, is offended and disappointed by NSW Planning Minister Kristina Keneally’s decision to ignore Traditional Owners and approve a mining extension under Woronora dam.
http://www.climatecamp.org.au/get-your-butts-there-climate-camp-09-dhara...
Video: http://www.climatecamp.org.au/video/climatecamp09-dharawal-land
“They are well aware of the damage that mining can do, and they go and approve something like this. We’re talking about millions and millions of litres of water, and they’re going to put a mine underneath it.”
“More people need to stand up. People need to be aware what’s good for their Country. Do we want to destroy it, destroy Mother Earth? That’s really what it’s all about.”
More info:
http://www.climatecamp.org.au/helensburgh2009
Share and invite friends to the Facebook Event
Follow climate camp on Twitter
Switch off Hazelwood, Victoria - September 12-13
http://www.switchoffhazelwood.org/
South Australia-Climate Camp = 24 - 27 September 2009
see http://climatecampsa.org/map.html

It's time to stand up to big polluters
10am, Saturday 16 May
Sydney Town Hall

IT'S TIME to:
* Stop handouts to big polluters
* End the influence of the fossil fuel lobby
* Fast-track clean, renewable energy
* Create green jobs and protect the climate

Join this peaceful community protest to oppose the Federal Government's recent moves to weaken the already inadequate Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme.

Speakers include Cate Faehrmann (Nature Conservation Council of NSW), Senator Bob Brown (The Greens), Simon Sheikh (GetUp!), Graham Brown (ex-Hunter Valley coal miner and climate change activist) and more.

Enough is Enough when it comes to the undue influence of big polluters over decisions being made on climate change.

Thanks and appreciation go to Mira Wroblewski for the images.
More images here:
http://picasaweb.google.com/miraw2/UrgentClimateChangeRallySydneyMay1620...

For further information see http://climatemovement.org.au
or call (02) 9279 2466.

Climate Action Bondi
WENTWORTH CLIMATE CHANGE FORUM

Electorate event: Wentworth NSW

With speaker Dr Mark Diesendorf, Institute of Environmental Studies, UNSW "Climate Change, the State of Play"

The action that residents of Wentworth take now to influence the candidates will have a major impact on how Australia tackles climate change. Come and find out how your candidates intend to represent your views about climate change.

CANDIDATES:

* Susan Jarnason (Greens)
* Pierce Field (Democrat)
* George Newhouse (Labor)
* Malcolm Turnbull (Liberal)

MC: Samantha Lang, film writer/director and Wentworth local

When: Wednesday 7 November 2007 at 7 PM
Where:
Auditorium, Waverley RSL Club,
1-9 Gray St, Bondi Junction
More details: 0419 002 606

With sincere thanks to Simon London for our e-petition signature no 951…

Great Muzo, Great all round guy.
Catch a show if he’s playing near you!

For CD’s visit: http://simonlondon.com

From: "allied artists management"
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:11 PM
Subject: here's one for the fridge!
visit: http://simonlondon.com

hey folks,

I've got a bunch of shows coming up. maybe stick this list on your
fridge so you can remember what's coming in the next few weeks..

Beware of "missing words" when perusing political party’s policies and deciding where you will be casting your PRECIOUS 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th votes....

If, like me, you wish to see an end to the nuclear industry (firstly) on moral grounds, followed closely by environmental grounds, and clearly not needed on financial grounds, then expanding the mining of Uranium in Australia is NOT wanted, needed or necessary.

Of course if you are a Rio Tinto shareholder, you may think otherwise.

Recently, whilst participating in the Cycle against the nuclear cycle, I visited the Gladstone Office of our local standing MP, Paul Neville (National/Liberal Coalition) and spoke with his Secretary. She couldn't tell me if their party would be considering a nuclear power plant in this electorate or not. Her advice to me and my friend was that this issue needed further investigation. "Informed" decisions would not be forthcoming until after the election.

To me, that says... "when our party is voted back into power we will do whatever we want, it's not your business now. You are not a scientist!"
or... "don't you worry about that".

I am a registered voter. Where I put my mark IS my business. Where my taxes are spent IS my business. I need answers before these two parties are given further opportunities at destroying MY future.

The Labor Party won't commit to nuclear power stations (yet), they will however commit to an expansion of Uranium mining to supply the growing nuclear industry - and they already have.

The Greens, Socialist Alliance and Australian Democrats are clear where they stand. They stand in favour of sustainable development, social justice and equality. Clearly, nuclear does not fit the bill. These parties have made it clear in their policies that they will not support an expansion of the nuclear industry or nuclear energy - (as an "alternative" energy).

The new party "Climate Change Coalition" (CCC) stands in favour of sustainable housing developments, improved transportation systems and better education (as do the three parties listed above).

The CCC are in favour of many good things which will mitigate the worst effects of climate change in the long term but so are the Greens, the Socialist Alliance and the Australian Democrats.

However, the CCC intend to leave ALL OTHER polices to the "conscience vote" of any candidate who is elected. This tends to really worry me. How will their ideas and policies be implemented? Where is their financial plan for our taxes? What say the CCC on our health care taxes? Where do they stand on Industrial Relations and Workplace Agreements?

What also worries me is that they leave the door open for the nuclear industry when they state:

..."Does nuclear power have a role to play in a climate change reduction strategy? James Lovelock, the founder of Gaia Hypothesis, thinks that it can be a useful element in a greenhouse reduction strategy for some countries. Others, such as Australian scientist and climate change campaigner, Emeritus Professor Ian Lowe sees nuclear power as a cure as bad as the disease.
This debate is unavoidable and essential. The CCC encourages our best and brightest minds to state their cases - realising that any debate on Nuclear Power immediately involves alternative power."

In other words... when it comes to the nuclear industry and nuclear power... they sit on the fence. Let others worry about that in an informed and "open" debate? History clearly shows the "openness" of the nuclear industry and the honesty of their "debate".

There is no need for further debate. Expanding the nuclear industry IS avoidable and NOT essential.

The nuclear industry is not safe, and it never was, and it never will be.
In any doubt? please visit:

Startling fact and figures:
http://www.43things.com/entries/view/1888283

Or "Maralinga - Learn from our experience" by my (then) 15yo daughter, Natalie:
http://www.43things.com/entries/view/1881061
and explore the highly educational links in the Appendix

or Nuclear Industry - human effects - facts you should know http://www.43things.com/entries/view/1875511

Finally, today's latest:
Nuclear Power and water scarcity: By Dr Jim Green
http://globalclimatechangeaction.org/node/122
(fliers available shortly)

It appears that the CCC's nuclear policies are hand in hand with those of our currently elected leaders... they "may" support nuclear industry power generation and an expansion of this industry and the associated waste.
Their "vote catching policies" are attached in a PDF document.

Unless the CCC can inform me clearly that they will not support nuclear power or an expansion of the nuclear industry in Australia, I will be putting my vote for the CCC below the ALP, to be sure that their preference flow does not re-elect a National/Liberal Coalition.

I hope other voters are aware of the insidious nature of the nuclear industry and all of their "dirty tricks" to retain their control over our precious taxes.

Anne Goddard

Please distribute to Union Members for their consideration

via:
http://leftclickblog.blogspot.com/

full story:
http://leftclickblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/all-unions-should-back-greens....

Snip>:
All unions should back the Greens
by Socialist Worker

Enough is enough. That is the message coming from thousands of working people across the country about WorkChoices. There is no doubt that Howard is spooked by the overwhelmingly mood against him. Tragically Labor is so concerned to keep big business onside that it has promised to keep important parts of the legislation.

These include the ban on the right to strike and the right of unions to enter workplaces.
This is ridiculous-how can unions survive, let alone prosper, if they cannot enter workplaces to talk to members?

more: http://leftclickblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/all-unions-should-back-greens....

Further comments via Green Left Discussion Group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GreenLeft_discussion/message/47418
and
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GreenLeft_discussion/message/47420

My comments:
ALL UNION MEMBERS should be encouraged to volunteer to scrutineer for their local candidate. This is the best way to ensure (in an open an honest voting system) that ALL votes are counted and EVERY vote sees the light of day.
For further information on what scrutineering entails, visit:
http://www.aec.gov.au/Parties_and_Representatives/Candidate/Handbook/scr...

cc Unions